Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 06:05

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Do humans know everything they need to know?
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How can I be okay with being ugly? What is the bright side?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Night Owls More Impulsive Than Morning Larks - Neuroscience News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Morning Briefing: Lindor Ties Jeter on Home Run Leaderboard - Metsmerized Online
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Used vehicle prices ease from tariff fear-buying highs but remain elevated - CNBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Greetings from Warsaw, Poland, where the flags are flying ahead of a key election - NPR